Edmonds Judd

incentives

Budget 2025

‘Fiscally conservative’?

On 22 May, the Minister of Finance, the Hon Nicola Willis, presented what she had termed a ‘No BS Budget.’ It is officially entitled ‘The Growth Budget.’

 

Described by the minister as being ‘fiscally conservative,’ public expectations were not high for a lolly scramble of funding for new initiatives.

 

In the weeks leading up to the Budget, the minister drip-fed announcements of about $1.9 billion of new spending and, amongst others, a significant ‘restructure’ to the pay equity regime. As a result,

it was anticipated that on Budget Day, there would be what the minister has called ‘reprioritising of spending.’

 

Over the past few years, New Zealand has experienced an extended period of high inflation, high interest rates and low growth. With this 2025 Budget and despite worldwide geopolitical and geoeconomic tensions, the minister has indicated New Zealand’s fiscal outlook will gradually recover, despite an initial period of retraction. The government now expects what the minister has called ‘a modest surplus’ by 2028–29.

 

Good news for business

Called Investment Boost, businesses can now write off 20% of the value of productive new assets such as machinery, tools and equipment from that year’s taxable income – in addition to regular depreciation rates. By encouraging investment, the government expects a 1% increase in GDP and wages by 1.5% over the next 20 years, with half of these gains being in the next five years.

 

Greeted positively by the business sector, these new rules came into force on 22 May, passed under urgency after the Budget was presented.

 

Intended to attract foreign investment to this country, the government has created a new agency, Invest New Zealand. The agency’s objective is to create a vibrant investment market in this country. Initially collaborating with New Zealand Trade and Enterprise, Invest New Zealand has a clear direction to attract international capital, ideas and expertise in order to lift wages and grow the country’s economy.

 

Additionally, the government says it will be easier for startups to compete for talent by changing how employee share schemes are taxed.

 

Supporting New Zealand’s strong position in the film industry, screen production rebates will be renewed.

 

Government cuts contributions to KiwiSaver

The government’s contribution to KiwiSaver accounts is to be halved. Until now, KiwiSaver account holders have received $521 a year from the government; this is to be cut to $260.72.

 

In addition, the threshold for the minimum ‘default’ rate of employee and matching employer KiwiSaver contributions is to be increased from 3% to 4%; this is to be a two-step process over the next three years. This will be optional; KiwiSaver account holders may opt to stay at 3%. With many KiwiSaver balances ‘modest,’ the minister says this change should encourage New Zealanders to save more for their retirement.

 

More positive news for New Zealand’s younger taxpayers is that 16 and 17-year-olds will start to receive government contributions to their KiwiSaver from July (currently there is no contribution). Requirements for employers to match these deposits will start in 2026.

 

Benefits

Jobseeker and emergency benefits to be means tested: Not anticipated by pundits, 18 and 19-year-olds will have their Jobseeker and emergency benefits tested against their parents’ incomes, although there are some exemptions. The threshold against which these benefits will be measured is yet to be decided.

 

Medicine prescriptions: The length of a prescription is to be extended from three months to 12 months.

 

Working for Families: Targeted at low to middle-income families with children, the family income threshold and abatement rate will increase by an average of $14/fortnight. The additional cost for this will be funded by extending the income testing for the Best Start tax credit to include the first year after having a child, as well as the current situation of means testing for the second and third years. Payments will cease when a family’s income reaches $97,000 a year.

 

SuperGold card: A rise in the income threshold will allow a rates rebate for 66,000 additional lower income households with a SuperGold cardholder.

 

Disability Support Allowance: $760 million has been allocated to support the disability sector. The government has called this a ‘seismic shift’ in funding.

 

More . . .

Already announced and included in Thursday’s Budget is more funding for health, education, law and order, and other frontline public services. This includes:

  • Significant additional funding for the education sector for children with additional learning needs, schools/early childhood education and tertiary operational grants; additional help with maths skills; and lifting school attendance,
  • Nelson Hospital is to undergo a much-publicised need for redevelopment, together with Wellington’s emergency department. Auckland hospitals are to be upgraded,
  • After decades of underinvestment, the country’s rail will receive a $460 million upgrade to the metro and regional rail networks, and
  • The Defence Force will receive significantly more investment to boost New Zealand’s capabilities for the army, navy and air force, and in cyberspace.

 

To read the Budget in more detail, click here for the minister’s Budget speech.

 

If you would like to discuss the implications of the government’s business incentives, please don’t hesitate to contact us.

 

Major changes ahead for New Zealand’s financial landscape.

DISCLAIMER: All the information published in Property Speaking is true and accurate to the best of the authors’ knowledge. It should not be a substitute for legal advice. No liability is assumed by the authors or publisher for losses suffered by any person or organisation relying directly or indirectly on this newsletter. Views expressed are those of individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Edmonds Judd. Articles appearing in Property Speaking may be reproduced with prior approval from the editor and credit given to the source.
Copyright, NZ LAW Limited, 2022.     Editor: Adrienne Olsen.       E-mail: [email protected].       Ph: 029 286 3650

 


Retention tools and some risks

Since 2021 and the lessening of the effects of the Covid pandemic, many countries have experienced an increase in staff turnover and lost productivity. This is informally referred to as ‘the great resignation’, ‘the big quit’, ‘brain drain’ and ‘quiet quitting’.

 

These trends are concerning as turnover and lost productivity present further challenges to businesses that may already be struggling in a weakening economy.

 

Employers can implement retention tools to minimise turnover and ensure employee engagement. As with all employment contractual changes, care needs to be taken to ensure that these do not result in unexpected consequences for either party. We look at the most common retention tools that employers might consider along with some alerts when using these incentives.

 

Incentives are variations to the employment agreement

All incentives are a variation to your employee’s individual employment agreement. When considering any form of incentive, you must ensure that all changes are consulted on, and agreed to, by your employee. The agreed changes should be documented appropriately, usually with your lawyer’s assistance, and signed by both parties.

 

You must document and record all changes to employment terms and benefits. When employment variations are made and you don’t keep accurate records and act in accordance with those records, you are at risk of a personal grievance claim from your employee. In addition, inaccurate recordkeeping can attract penalties from the Labour Inspector for not complying with the Employment Relations Act 2000 and the Holidays Act 2003.

 

When considering an incentive for your employee, consultation regarding tax consequences, including fringe benefit tax (FBT), with your accountant or tax advisor is essential.

 

Cash and performance-based bonuses

The most commonly used, and arguably most straightforward tool to increase employee engagement and performance short-term, is a cash bonus. This payment can be made as a lump sum for existing performance, or it can be a bonus based on agreed and documented requirements for future performance.

 

If you pay a discretionary cash bonus, one costly mistake you could make is to unintentionally increase your employee’s ‘gross earnings.’ If a payment is not correctly identified as a discretionary additional payment, then the increase to their ‘gross earnings’ can also affect payment required for their other entitlements such as annual leave.

 

In landmark cases in 2020 and 2021[1], the court considered whether or not a bonus scheme was part of ‘gross earnings’ for an employee. Originally the bonuses were considered part of the ‘gross earnings’ and the company had to pay out significant additional annual leave entitlements. On appeal, this was overturned.

 

Ultimately, the court decided that a primary indicator as to whether a bonus counted as ‘gross earnings’ was whether the employer retained discretion to not pay the bonus, even if the performance targets had been met. Importantly, the law was clear that the payment needed to be a true ‘discretion’, and merely labelling or titling it as ‘discretionary’ did not suffice.

 

Being careful on how this payment is documented and ensuring it is ‘truly discretionary’ will help prevent unnecessary increased annual leave payments. If it is discretionary, you will need to ensure it’s recorded as such in your payroll system.

 

Retention bonus

Another common tool is a retention bonus where your employee is guaranteed a lump sum cash payment at the end of a retention period (often between 12-36 months).

 

All agreements should contemplate what happens if your employee decides to leave during their retention period. This could be a resignation, dismissal due to poor performance or, if the market required, your employee’s role/position may be made redundant. The nature of the event giving rise to the dismissal will likely determine whether the bonus is paid or not, and if paid, whether partially or in full.

 

Retention bonuses can also become payable on the occurrence of a prescribed event. Regardless of when payment is made, the impact on annual leave must be considered in the same way as for a performance bonus.

 

Bonding clauses

Another way to retain your employees is to provide payment for further education or formal qualifications in exchange for your employee staying for a period of time after the training or further education has been completed. If your employee leaves, they might be asked to repay some, or all, of the training costs covered.

 

While bonding clauses can increase employee engagement as well as enhancing the value of your employee to your business, when considering bonding clauses you should seek specific legal advice to ensure the bonding clause is enforceable. The enforceability is dependent on many factors including fairness to your employee. If the bonding clause is deemed to be unfair, you may not be able recover the training costs already paid when your employee leaves earlier than their bonded term.

 

Shares or equity in the business

One of the most effective long-term retention tools for key employees is to offer shares in the business. These shares can be restricted so that the value the employee receives for the shares is minimal if they leave within a prescribed period. If they stay longer than the prescribed period, they can sell the shares for their actual value. This is an excellent tool as not only does it provide a good incentive for your employee to stay, but it also incentivises them to grow the value of the business during their tenure.

 

This process should always be guided by your lawyer; there are several steps and the requirements will be unique to each business. For new shareholders, a shareholders’ agreement should be prepared that covers all shareholder rights such as pre-emptive rights for the majority shareholder (the main business owner) to buy back the shares and voting rights of all the parties. Often this process will require a valuation of the business, and there will be significant considerations regardless of the structure implemented.

 

Meeting the market

Looking at the wider labour market and demands for particular roles will help you identify employees who are most at risk of leaving. Often, if employees are in short supply, the market remuneration will have increased and you should consider meeting the market rates to reduce staff temptation to leave.

 

Other incentives that can make an employer competitive are increased annual leave, wellbeing payments, health insurance, allowing personal use of work phones or vehicles, flexible working and interest-free or low interest loans (some of which have FBT consequences).

 

Have a highly engaged culture

Ultimately, retaining staff is a complex area that involves much more than just financial incentives. Ensuring your workplace has developed a highly engaged culture that supports your employees’ individual needs and that your employees feel valued will all help with your overall retention strategy.

 

With the rapidly changing employment market it can be understandably challenging to retain key staff. If you have an employee you think you are at risk of losing, think about what retention tools will mean the most to that person; and remember to talk with us about what steps you should take before offering any incentives.

 

[1] (Metropolitan Glass & Glazing Limited v Labour Inspector, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [2020] NZEmpC 39 and subsequent appeal of that decision in Metropolitan Glass & Glazing Limited v Labour Inspector, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [2021] NZCA 560).

 

DISCLAIMER: All the information published in Fineprint is true and accurate to the best of the authors’ knowledge. It should not be a substitute for legal advice. No liability is assumed by the authors or publisher for losses suffered by any person or organisation relying directly or indirectly on this newsletter. Views expressed are those of individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Edmonds Judd. Articles appearing in Fineprint may be reproduced with prior approval from the editor and credit given to the source.
Copyright, NZ LAW Limited, 2022.     Editor: Adrienne Olsen.       E-mail: [email protected].       Ph: 029 286 3650