+64 7 872 0236 [email protected]

NZFarming

Over the fence

Employment Law, Government & Policy, Rural & Agricultural Law, Succession Planning, Trusts & Asset Planning, Wills & Estates
0

Biosecurity overhaul

In July 2025, the Ministry of Primary Industries released its proposed ‘Biosecurity System Action Plan.’ It is intended to guide new legislation to amend the Biosecurity Act 1993, and to overhaul current biosecurity regimes to improve process, obligations and rights. This will impact importing/exporting, practices on farm and government accessibility to farms.

The action plan is presented in two tranches. The first focuses on immediate priorities – clarifying roles, modernising processes and providing training tools. The second tranche will build on successful initiatives, consider social and cultural impacts and develop long term resolutions. Significant progress on both tranches by 2030 is proposed.

Key proposed amendments following submissions and consultation include:

  • Placing greater decision-making discretion with regional councils and management agencies – including the ability to create exemptions, issue permits for pests and produce small scale management plans
  • Increasing and introducing new penalties, including for obstructing a lawful search
  • The ability to grant one-off or ad hoc permits for imported goods, and
  • Removing the need for the current exemption for regional councils to enter private land to manage pests.

A draft bill is anticipated to be presented to Parliament in late 2026.

To read more on the Biosecurity System Action Plan, the steering group workshops and the proposed next steps, click here.

 

Employee v contractor

On 21 February 2026, a new ‘gateway test’ was introduced to determine whether an individual is an employee or a contractor in terms of employment law. The gateway test does not apply retrospectively.

Gateway test: An individual is a contractor if they meet all the gateway test criteria. These are:

  • There must be a written agreement stating they are an independent contractor or are not an employee
  • No restriction from working for others (except while undertaking agreed work)
  • They are not required to work at a specified time/period OR they can subcontract the work, subject to legally required or justifiable vetting
  • Additional future work can be declined without the arrangement being terminated, and
  • There has been a reasonable opportunity to seek independent advice before entering into the arrangement.

If all criteria are satisfied, the individual is a contractor. If any of the criteria is not met or for claims brought prior to 21 February 2026 the common law test (below) applies.

The four factors below are considered together to determine whether an individual is a contractor:

  1. Intention – what did the parties intend the relationship to be? Consider entitlements received – for example, contractors are not entitled to holiday pay.
  2. Control v independence – high employer control over hours, work and methods may be indicative of an employer/employee relationship
  3. Integration – is the role fundamental to an employer’s business and continuous in nature, and
  4. Fundamental/economic reality – does the economic reality reflect a person in business on their own account? Consider fee structure, tax obligations, ability for the individual to profit and who bears financial risk.

The distinction between an employee and contractor is highly relevant for the rural sector as you may have both contractors (such as sharemilkers and contract milkers) and employees (farm hands, managers, etc) working on your property.

 

Wills and EPAs: essential for rural sector

For people who are responsible for farms and other major assets, it is important to ensure you have a current will and Enduring Powers of Attorney (EPAs). If you don’t have these and you die unexpectedly, lose mental capacity, or are unable to attend to your personal affairs for a period, it could lead to not only farming operations being disrupted, but also family uncertainty and having to spend time and money on sorting things out.

Will: Your will sets out your instructions about the distribution of your property to your family after you die. Even if you have a will, it is good practice to regularly review it, so it reflects your current situation and wishes.

If you don’t have a will, there is legislation[1] that decides how your estate is divided up; this arrangement may not be what you would wish. To prevent this, it’s optimal (and much easier) to ensure you have a valid will that reflects your wishes. Your family will thank you for it.

EPA: An EPA is a legal document that allows a trusted person (your attorney) to manage your affairs and personal care. There are two forms of EPA – one covering property affairs and the other about your personal wellbeing. An EPA for personal care only applies if you lose mental capacity, while an EPA for property can also apply while you have capacity.

For a property EPA, your attorney could be a trusted friend or relative, or you could appoint a trustee company to manage your property matters.

For a personal care and welfare EPA, you can only appoint a person as your attorney.

We can help you set up EPAs and a will or, if you already have them, review them so they reflect your current situation.

[1] Administration Act 1969.

 

 

DISCLAIMER: All the information published in Rural eSpeaking is true and accurate to the best of the authors’ knowledge. It should not be a substitute for legal advice. No liability is assumed by the authors or publisher for losses suffered by any person or organisation relying directly or indirectly on this newsletter. Views expressed are those of individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Edmonds Judd. Articles appearing in Rural eSpeaking may be reproduced with prior approval from the editor and credit given to the source.
Content Copyright © NZ LAW Limited, 2026.    Editor: Adrienne Olsen.       E-mail: [email protected]      Ph: 029 286 3650

WorkSafe’s heightened focus on farm safety

Employment Law, Health & Safety, Regulatory Compliance, Rural & Agricultural Law, Workplace Regulation
0

Development of Approved Codes of Practice

WorkSafe New Zealand has promised greater attention to safety in the agricultural sector when it announced the new four-year ‘Statement of Intent’ on 4 December 2025.

In recent years, WorkSafe has significantly increased its focus on the agricultural sector reflecting the industry’s persistently high rates of serious injury and fatalities. Farming remains one of the most hazardous occupations in New Zealand, and WorkSafe’s evolving approach aims to address the root causes of harm while working more collaboratively with those on the land.

A key development has been the designation of agriculture as a priority high-risk sector. Alongside the other sectors classified as high-risk (construction, manufacturing and forestry), farming now receives a significantly greater share of WorkSafe’s attention and resources.

This prioritisation is embedded in the regulator’s broader strategy which centres on reducing fatalities, minimising serious injuries and targeting the activities most likely to cause harm. Rather than applying a one-size-fits-all regulatory model, WorkSafe is increasingly tailoring its interventions to reflect the unique risks present on farms.

 

Greater attention

One of the most visible aspects of WorkSafe’s effort is the development of Approved Codes of Practice (ACOPs) specific to agriculture. These codes are designed to clarify what ‘good practice’ looks like in practical, farm-based scenarios.

Current and emerging ACOPs focus heavily on the use of vehicles and machinery – areas consistently identified as leading causes of death and injury on farms. This includes guidance on quad bikes, tractors, utes and side-by-side vehicles, as well as their safe operation on uneven terrain and proper maintenance procedures.

Additional codes address responsibilities in multi-operator environments and provide clearer expectations around child safety on farms – an issue of ongoing concern in rural communities.

Alongside regulatory guidance, WorkSafe has expanded its on-the-ground presence. Inspectors are increasingly visiting farms not only to assess compliance, but also to engage directly with farmers and workers.

Hundreds of visits have been carried out in concentrated periods, with around 1,000 farm visits conducted between October and December 2025 with a focus on observing real-world practices involving machinery, hazardous substances and general risk management.

These visits are not purely enforcement-driven; they are also intended to provide practical advice and identify common issues across the sector. This hands-on approach allows WorkSafe to gather valuable data while building relationships within the farming community.

 

More collaboration

Another important element of WorkSafe’s strategy is its emphasis on education and industry collaboration. Acknowledging that lasting improvements in safety require cultural change, the regulator has partnered with industry groups and events to promote safer practices. Campaigns and resources such as ‘Keep safe, keep farming’ aim to integrate health and safety into everyday decision-making on farms.

By working with organisations that already have credibility in rural communities, WorkSafe’s aim is to influence behaviour in a way that traditional enforcement alone cannot achieve.

Perhaps the most notable shift in WorkSafe’s approach is its move toward a more balanced model of regulation, combining enforcement with proactive guidance.

While WorkSafe retains the ability to take enforcement action where necessary, there is now a stronger emphasis on helping farmers understand and meet their obligations before incidents occur.

This reflects an understanding that many farmers operate in complex, resource-constrained environments where practical, accessible advice can be more effective than punitive measures alone.

 

Looking ahead

WorkSafe New Zealand’s activities in the agricultural sector represent an evolving strategy.

Through targeted regulation, increased farm visits, collaborative education efforts and a focus on the most significant risks, the regulator is working to improve safety outcomes across one of New Zealand’s most vital industries. While challenges remain, the current approach signals a commitment to reducing harm through both accountability and support.

To read more on WorkSafe’s ACOPs, click here.

 

 

DISCLAIMER: All the information published in Rural eSpeaking is true and accurate to the best of the authors’ knowledge. It should not be a substitute for legal advice. No liability is assumed by the authors or publisher for losses suffered by any person or organisation relying directly or indirectly on this newsletter. Views expressed are those of individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Edmonds Judd. Articles appearing in Rural eSpeaking may be reproduced with prior approval from the editor and credit given to the source.
Content Copyright © NZ LAW Limited, 2026.    Editor: Adrienne Olsen.       E-mail: [email protected]      Ph: 029 286 3650

KiwiSaver changes open the door to first farm ownership

Banking & Finance, Government & Policy, Property Law, Rural & Agricultural Law, Wealth & Retirement Planning
0

Good news for rural workers

The government has announced important changes to KiwiSaver that will make it easier for farmers and rural workers to use their KiwiSaver to buy their first farm. These reforms acknowledge the unique way in which farms are owned and operated in New Zealand.

For many in the rural sector, particularly sharemilkers, contract milkers and farm managers eager to climb the property ladder, this represents a meaningful step toward farm ownership.

Legislation giving effect to these changes will be introduced to Parliament in the middle of the year.

 

Key changes

Until now, KiwiSaver first-home withdrawals have been limited to residential property purchases, with strict requirements that the buyer both owns and lives in the home. This has created barriers for those pursuing farm ownership, as farms are often:

  • Purchased through companies or trusts, rather than in an individual’s name, and
  • Used as both a business and a place of residence, sometimes with accommodation arrangements tied to employment.

The upcoming changes are designed to address these challenges by allowing eligible KiwiSaver members to withdraw their funds to buy a first farm, even where the ownership structure is more complex.

 

Who can benefit?

The updated rules will apply to people who would ordinarily qualify for KiwiSaver first-home withdrawal, who have contributed to KiwiSaver for at least three years and not previously owned a home (or being approved as a ‘second chance’ buyer). The changes are aimed at first-time farm buyers, not those expanding existing farming operations.

 

Key conditions

While the rules are becoming more flexible, there are still some important conditions for first-time farm buyers:

  • Control of the farm: You must have a meaningful ownership interest in the entity purchasing the farm (for example, a majority shareholding or controlling interest). This ensures KiwiSaver is being used to support genuine ownership, not passive investment
  • Connection to the property: The farm must still have a residential element connected to you. While the strict ‘live in the home’ rule is being relaxed, the purchase must still align with the intent of helping you secure your primary place of living and working
  • First property focus: The withdrawal remains limited to your first property purchase (or equivalent approved situation), and
  • Standard application process: You will still need to apply through your KiwiSaver provider, providing supporting documents such as a signed sale and purchase agreement and statutory declarations.

 

Why this matters for farmers

For many in the dairy and wider farming sector, progressing from employment or sharemilking into ownership has always required significant capital. KiwiSaver is often one of the few accumulated assets available to younger farmers. By allowing KiwiSaver funds to be used in farm purchases — and recognising company and trust structures – the law is now better aligned with how farming businesses actually operate.

This change is expected to improve access to deposits for first-time farm buyers, support succession planning within the rural sector and help younger farmers transition into ownership earlier.

 

Considerations before proceeding

While the changes are positive, there is still some complexity involved. Before relying on KiwiSaver funds for a farm purchase, it is important to consider:

  • How the farm purchase will be legally structured
  • Whether your level of ownership meets the control requirements
  • The impact on lending and finance arrangements, and
  • Ensuring your application meets your KiwiSaver provider’s requirements.

We recommend you seek legal and financial advice early in the process; this will help ensure everything is set up correctly from the outset.

 

Final thoughts

These reforms mark a practical and long-overdue shift in KiwiSaver policy. By acknowledging that farms are both homes and businesses, the government will create a more realistic pathway for rural New Zealanders to enter farm ownership.

With the changes in the legislative pipeline, if you are considering farm ownership, now is a good time to start planning and take advice on how best to position yourself.

 

 

DISCLAIMER: All the information published in Rural eSpeaking is true and accurate to the best of the authors’ knowledge. It should not be a substitute for legal advice. No liability is assumed by the authors or publisher for losses suffered by any person or organisation relying directly or indirectly on this newsletter. Views expressed are those of individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Edmonds Judd. Articles appearing in Rural eSpeaking may be reproduced with prior approval from the editor and credit given to the source.
Content Copyright © NZ LAW Limited, 2026.    Editor: Adrienne Olsen.       E-mail: [email protected]      Ph: 029 286 3650

Over the Fence

Disputes Resolution, ETS & Forestry, Farming Best Practice, Health & Safety, Law Changes, Rural Property
0

New limits on farmland to forestry conversions

The amount of farmland being converted to exotic forestry and registered in the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) has been limited with the introduction of the Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading Scheme-Forestry Conversions) Amendment Act 2025. The legislation came into force on 31 October 2025.

‘Farmland’ is classified according to the Land Use Capability (LUC) scale. Classification is based on the farmland’s long-term ability to support various productive uses. Features such as climate, soil, slope, vegetation and erodibility are taken into consideration. The classes include:

  • Classes 1 to 4 – arable land for a range of cultivations
  • Classes 5 to 7 – non-arable land suitable for pastoral farming and forestry, and
  • Class 8 – severe restrictions around land use.

Since 31 October, there are new limits on how much exotic forest can be registered on the ETS. The restrictions impact post-1989 forest land classified within LUC classes 1 to 6 that was not already forestry land on 31 October 2025, where the forest species on the land are mostly exotic. If one of the following exceptions apply, however, the land can still enter the ETS:

  • Indigenous forest land
  • Exempt as Māori land
  • High or severe erosion prone land in a regional or district plan
  • Crown afforestation land
  • Unmapped and not on the national LUC scale map
  • Unfarmed land, or
  • Classed as 7 or 8 on the LUC scale.

You can check your land’s classification on the national LUC map or have your own LUC assessment completed.

If land is restricted from conversion to forestry under the Act you may still register up to 25% of restricted land on an individual farm in the ETS scheme. There is also a biannual national ballot for land classed as 6 on the LUC scale to allow a further 15,000 hectares annually to enter the ETS scheme. The 25% allowance is of your total land within the farm boundary including any non-restricted land.

The new legislation aims to protect the future of New Zealand food production, while still allowing sustainable growth in the forestry sector. It also protects farmers’ ability to diversify their farmland.

 

Increase in Disputes Tribunal jurisdiction

From 24 January 2026, the Disputes Tribunal’s financial jurisdiction will increase from $30,000 to $60,000. These changes will improve New Zealanders’ access to cost-effective justice.

Filing fee increase: The Tribunal’s filing fees will also increase as they are set in tiers according to the amount in dispute. The filing fee for claims of $30,001 or more will be $468.

The tiered filing fee system reflects the amount of time taken to hear the dispute with larger claims assumed to take longer and have greater impact on the parties. While the new tier is higher than the current cost to file a claim in the District Court, the Tribunal does not charge additional hearing fees so access to justice is still improved.

Tribunal process: The Disputes Tribunal provides timely, low-cost, and accessible resolutions for many civil or contractual disputes. Hearings are run by a referee in an informal setting, unlike the formal court process. Lawyers are not permitted.

The Tribunal does not deal with undisputed debts, disputed debt valued over $60,000, employment issues, tenancy issues, social benefit disputes, wills or estate disputes, land disputes, intellectual property or family law. For these disputes there are other means of seeking justice such as the District or Family Court and so on.

Good for resolving contractual disputes: For farmers, this expansion provides a more accessible avenue for resolving contractual disputes. It offers a cheaper, faster alternative to the court system and avoids the common issue where civil claims between $30,000 and $60,000 are uneconomic to pursue. Previously, claims were partly abandoned to limit a claim to $30,000 and stay within the financial jurisdiction of the Disputes Tribunal. The ability to abandon part of a claim will still be available to bring larger claims down to $60,000 but, as before, one large claim cannot be broken up into multiple smaller claims.

Time limits: It is still important to be mindful of any applicable time limits involved in a claim. For example, some contract milking agreements require specific notice of disputes to be raised within 28 days of either becoming aware of the issue or the end of the season, whichever occurs earlier. While those clauses may not apply to claims before the Disputes Tribunal, it would be wise to ensure they are met to avoid any argument, especially if the Tribunal’s jurisdiction will be exceeded.

Although we cannot appear at the Disputes Tribunal, if you would like some advice on a potential claim or defence we are happy to help.

 

Health and safety considerations for farm visits

With the growing popularity of farm visits and stays, it is important to understand the health and safety implications that come with hosting visitors on your farm.

Farm hosts must take all reasonably practicable steps to eliminate or minimise risks, considering the likelihood and severity of harm, what visitors can reasonably be expected to know, and the availability, suitability, and cost of the ways to eliminate or minimise those risks. All this comes under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015.

Whether your farm guests are staying overnight or just visiting an operating farm or workplace, it is important to consider if they will be in a vicinity of animals, heavy machinery or hazardous substances. Procedures need to be in place to mitigate the risk of damage or harm to your visitors, other workers and animals. The legislation states that this responsibility falls to the person in charge of the business or undertaking (PCBU).

It is good practice to provide all your farm guests with health and safety information, and requirements before they arrive or, at the latest, on their arrival. Where possible, your guests should sign a written confirmation that they have been provided with the information and requirements. Warnings and prohibited areas should also be clearly displayed onsite, so it is clear to all visitors the immediate dangers present.

The PCBU must warn authorised visitors of any work-related, or out of the ordinary, hazards that may cause them serious harm. For many people who are visiting a farm the usual hazards that farmers would always avoid may not be immediately obvious. Examples of these are chemicals such as herbicides and pesticides, animals, machinery, and water hazards such as oxidation ponds and troughs.

This duty applies only to authorised visitors who have the farmer’s or owner’s permission to be on the farm. A PCBU will not be liable under the Act for harm suffered by people who enter your property without permission.

Visitors also have responsibilities. They must take reasonable care to ensure their actions, or lack of, don’t put themselves or others at risk. They must also comply with any reasonable instructions given by the PCBU, as far as practicable.

If you are establishing a farm stay or walk over the summer, we’re happy to help you set this up.

 

DISCLAIMER: All the information published in Rural eSpeaking is true and accurate to the best of the authors’ knowledge. It should not be a substitute for legal advice. No liability is assumed by the authors or publisher for losses suffered by any person or organisation relying directly or indirectly on this newsletter. Views expressed are those of individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Edmonds Judd. Articles appearing in Rural eSpeaking may be reproduced with prior approval from the editor and credit given to the source.
Copyright, NZ LAW Limited, 2025.     Editor: Adrienne Olsen.       E-mail: [email protected]    Ph: 029 286 3650

Get in touch today, we’d love to talk.

+64 7 872 0236 [email protected]