WorkplaceCompliance

Navigating redundancy

Understanding the legal process for employers

Redundancy refers to a situation where an employee’s position is deemed superfluous to an employer’s needs. Understandably, a redundancy proposal can bring stress and uncertainty to those affected. Unfortunately, it is a term that many New Zealanders may be familiar with.

We provide a summary of the required process, and obligations by you, as an employer, in proposing a potential redundancy in your organisation.

 

Lawful redundancy

For a redundancy to be lawful, it must be both justified and carried out through a fair process. A redundancy is justified only where there is a genuine commercial reason for it; redundancy cannot be used as a means to dismiss a poor performing employee or as an alternative to a disciplinary process for misconduct.

‘Genuine commercial reasons’ may include a downturn in work/revenue, declining financial performance, organisational restructuring, or the merger or acquisition of a business. Courts are increasingly applying scrutiny into the ‘commercial rationale’ for a redundancy.

However, even where a genuine reason exists, the dismissal will not be lawful unless the correct process is followed.

 

Process

The process that all employers must follow includes:
• Providing your employees with relevant information about the proposed change and the potential impact on their employment if the proposal is adopted
• Consultation with your employees and considering their feedback (and enabling your employees opportunities to seek advice or support within the consultation period)
• Considering alternatives to redundancy, and
• Following any additional procedural requirements specified in the relevant employment agreement or policy documents.

 

Providing information

The Employment Relations Act 2000 sets out that an employer who is proposing to make a decision that will, or is likely to, have an adverse effect on the continuation of employment of one or more of his or her employees, is required to provide the affected employees with access to relevant information about the decision.

The term ‘relevant information’ will depend on the specific circumstances. It includes, however, information necessary for employees to understand the rationale for the proposed change and to enable them to provide informed feedback. Your employee is entitled to ask for additional information relevant to your proposal. While an employer is not required to provide confidential information, they must be able to genuinely demonstrate that disclosure would cause actual, unreasonable prejudice, and must show that they have explored alternative options for confidential consultation.

 

Consultation

You are not only required to provide a potentially affected employee with all relevant information, but you must also ensure there is a genuine opportunity for your employee to comment on that information before any decision is made. This includes providing sufficient time to provide feedback.

You must approach this process with an open mind and genuinely consider any feedback received before deciding whether to proceed with the proposed change. Without genuine consultation, the redundancy may be deemed a pre-determined outcome, and a breach of your obligation as their employer to act in good faith.

 

Selection criteria

In circumstances where you are reducing a number of same/similar roles, a fair and reasonable selection process must be followed to decide which of your employees will be appointed to the remaining roles. Clear and relevant selection criteria should be provided to your employees in advance, and their feedback sought. This includes providing details as to how that criteria will be assessed and weighed.

 

Redeployment

If a role is disestablished, you have an obligation to consider redeployment opportunities within your organisation for any of your affected employees. The affected employee/s continuing employment must be considered before a new or vacant role is advertised externally. Redeployment must be considered for an affected employee, even if some (reasonable) training or upskilling may be required.

Your obligation to consider all redeployment options, stems from an employer’s statutory requirement of good faith – to be active and constructive in maintaining the employment relationship, including being responsive and communicative.

 

A challenging time

Proposed redundancy can be a challenging and uncertain time for all; but understanding the legal framework and the required process can help you to navigate this with more confidence.

It is also important to carefully review employment agreements and relevant workplace policies to carefully identify any relevant provisions, including any entitlement to redundancy compensation.

If your organisation is contemplating redundancies, we recommend you talk with us at the outset; this will help you and your employees better understand their rights and obligations.

 

 

DISCLAIMER: All the information published in Fineprint is true and accurate to the best of the authors’ knowledge. It should not be a substitute for legal advice. No liability is assumed by the authors or publisher for losses suffered by any person or organisation relying directly or indirectly on this newsletter. Views expressed are those of individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Edmonds Judd. Articles appearing in Fineprint may be reproduced with prior approval from the editor and credit given to the source.
Copyright, NZ LAW Limited, 2025.     Editor: Adrienne Olsen.       E-mail: [email protected]     Ph: 029 286 3650 


Complex legal obligations

In certain sectors, particularly agriculture, tourism and residential care, it’s common for employers to provide housing to their employees as part of the job. These arrangements are known as ‘service tenancies.’ They can be legally complex due to being dually governed by both employment law and residential tenancy law.

While providing accommodation for employees can support recruitment and retention, it also creates legal obligations that employers must manage carefully. In particular, an employer who provides accommodation becomes a landlord under the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (RTA), with all the associated duties and liabilities.

 

What is a ‘service tenancy’?

A service tenancy exists when an employer provides accommodation as part of an employment package. The key legal feature is that the right to occupy the premises is tied to the job – if the employment ends, an employer can give notice to also end the right to stay in the accommodation.

As the RTA applies to service tenancies, employers are subject to the same rules as residential tenancies, including:

  • The requirement for a written tenancy agreement
  • Obligations around rent, maintenance and quiet enjoyment, and
  • Dispute resolution through the Tenancy Tribunal.

Employers as landlords: key obligations

Employers offering accommodation must meet the full legal obligations of residential landlords, including:

  • Healthy homes standards: all residential rental properties, including service tenancies, must meet the standards’ requirements around heating, insulation, ventilation, drainage and moisture control
  • Tenancy agreements: a written tenancy agreement is mandatory, even when the housing is ‘part of the job.’ The agreement should clearly state:
  • That the tenancy is a service tenancy
  • The relationship between the tenancy and the employment agreement, and
  • The rental value or allowance (even if nil)

There need not be two separate documents: an employment agreement may incorporate the terms of the tenancy agreement, provided the requisite detail above is included.

  • Bond lodgment: if a bond is taken, it must be lodged with Tenancy Services within 23 working days after it’s received from the tenant/employee, even if the employer sees the accommodation as part of a broader employment arrangement, and
  • Notice periods: termination of a service tenancy must be handled according to section 53B of the RTA. If the employment ends, the landlord (employer) may give 14 days’ notice to vacate. However, this must be done with due process to avoid unlawful eviction claims.

 

Common pitfalls

Employers sometimes assume that service tenancies are informal or outside standard tenancy rules. This is not the case. Common mistakes include:

  • Failing to record the tenancy in writing
  • Not meeting healthy homes requirements, exposing employers to fines
  • Assuming the tenancy ends automatically with employment termination
  • Failing to consider the tax implications of the value of the rental, and
  • Charging rent without clearly defining it in the employment or tenancy agreement.

These errors can lead to disputes before the Tenancy Tribunal, with potential penalties for unlawful eviction, unlawful entry or breaches of maintenance obligations.

 

Employment relationship risks

As the accommodation is tied to employment, disputes can straddle two legal regimes: employment law and tenancy law. For instance, if an employee is dismissed and then evicted from their home they may challenge both the dismissal and the tenancy termination. However, while they can overlap in practice, the legal jurisdictions remain entirely separate and legal disputes can only be pursued in the relevant jurisdiction. For example, an employee cannot raise an issue with the compliance of healthy homes standards as part of a personal grievance claim in the Employment Relations Authority for unjustified disadvantage.[1]

Careful drafting is essential. Either the employment agreement needs to fully encompass the terms of the tenancy, or a standalone tenancy agreement also needs to be prepared.

 

Best practice for employers

  • Clearly link the accommodation to the employment but avoid automatic termination clauses that breach tenancy law
  • Ensure housing meets healthy homes standards, even if the employee is not paying rent, and
  • Talk with us before terminating the tenancy, especially if the employment ends in contentious circumstances.

 

Real benefits but be careful

Providing accommodation as part of an employment package can offer real benefits – but only if managed correctly. Employers must wear two hats: one as an employer and the other as a landlord.

Understanding and fulfilling their obligations under the RTA, as well as employment laws and regulations, is essential to avoid costly legal disputes and to ensure that employees are treated fairly and lawfully.

If you’re providing housing to staff, we recommend reviewing your tenancy and employment documents to ensure they’re up to date and legally compliant.

 

[1] Unjustified disadvantage is where an employer takes actions that negatively impact an employee’s working conditions, or ability to do their job, without a reasonable or justifiable reason.

 

DISCLAIMER: All the information published in Rural eSpeaking is true and accurate to the best of the authors’ knowledge. It should not be a substitute for legal advice. No liability is assumed by the authors or publisher for losses suffered by any person or organisation relying directly or indirectly on this newsletter. Views expressed are those of individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Edmonds Judd. Articles appearing in Property Speaking may be reproduced with prior approval from the editor and credit given to the source.
Copyright, NZ LAW Limited, 2022.     Editor: Adrienne Olsen.       E-mail: [email protected].       Ph: 029 286 3650