Edmonds Judd

Financial Services Regulation

Understanding your tax obligations

 

If you are buying or selling land (with or without a home on the section), it is important to have an accurate understanding about your tax obligations and whether GST will be applicable to your transaction.

GST is not typically applicable in residential sale and purchase transactions but, if you are GST-registered and the sale is part of your taxable activity, GST may apply.

Potential GST outcomes

If the buyer and seller are both GST-registered, the transfer of land is part of a taxable activity (for example: farming, or a commercial building), and the property is not used as a private residence, the transfers are typically zero-rated for GST (meaning GST is charged on the transaction at a rate of 0%).

If the buyer is GST-registered and the seller is not GST-registered, and the buyer intends to use the land as part of a taxable activity, the buyer may be able to claim GST.

If the seller is GST-registered (and claimed GST) and sells the land to a buyer who is not GST-registered, or does not intend to use the land as part of a taxable activity, the seller may need to return GST to Inland Revenue following the sale.

There can be additional complications where some part of the property is used for private purposes, and some part is used for a taxable activity. In this instance, some of the purchase price may be subject to GST, but some part of it may not.

Warranty as to GST status

The standard sale and purchase of real estate agreement contains a statement on the front page – ‘the vendor is registered under the GST Act in respect of this transaction and/or will be so registered at settlement.’

If you are GST-registered and the sale is a taxable supply, you will need to complete schedule one in the agreement. As a seller, you will need to tick either ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to this statement. You must provide a warranty that the answer you provide is correct and will remain correct as at settlement. If it later transpires that your answer was incorrect, you have breached a warranty and could be liable to the buyer for any losses they have suffered because of this breach. For example, if you provided a warranty that you were not GST-registered in relation to the transaction, the buyer may presume that they may claim GST from Inland Revenue following settlement if they will be GST-registered and intend to use the property for taxable supply. If you were, in fact, GST-registered, the buyer will not be able to do that, therefore you may be required to reimburse 15% of the purchase price to the buyer due to your breach of warranty.

If you are the buyer, the agreement contemplates your GST status potentially changing throughout the transaction. For example, you may initially sign the agreement in your personal name (and you are not GST-registered) and later you nominate a GST-registered company to complete the purchase.

The purchase price will be expressed as either ‘plus GST (if any)’ or ‘inclusive of GST (if any),’ which dictates how much you need to pay on settlement, depending on your GST status. It should be clear to all parties whether the buyer will be GST-registered on settlement date, as this can have GST implications for both parties.

Purchase price allocation

If GST is applicable to the transaction, you should consider whether you should agree with the other party on a purchase price allocation; completing a purchase price allocation is highly recommended in some situations since GST may be claimable on some items, but not others.

If the buyer and seller agree on a purchase price allocation in the agreement, this allocation must be used by both the seller and buyer when completing their respective tax returns. This provides certainty to both parties. The purchase price allocation can therefore have tax consequences for both buyer and seller, so it is important to get accounting advice on this allocation before signing the agreement.

Where to from here?

If GST is (or may be) applicable to your transaction, it is important that you get legal and accounting advice before signing the agreement. A mistake in the agreement cannot always be fixed by your professional advisers after signing; it could result in an unexpected GST bill, which can be very costly. We and your accountant will work together to ensure that the sale and purchase agreement accurately reflects your GST position and that you fully understand any potential tax consequences before signing the agreement.

 

 

 

 

[1] Purchase price allocation is where the price is allocated between the land and any buildings, and other fixtures, fittings, chattels or improvements.

DISCLAIMER: All the information published in Property Speaking is true and accurate to the best of the authors’ knowledge. It should not be a substitute for legal advice. No liability is assumed by the authors or publisher for losses suffered by any person or organisation relying directly or indirectly on this newsletter. Views expressed are those of individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Edmonds Judd. Articles appearing in Property Speaking may be reproduced with prior approval from the editor and credit given to the source.
Copyright, NZ LAW Limited, 2022.     Editor: Adrienne Olsen.       E-mail: [email protected].       Ph: 029 286 3650

 


Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Amendment Bill

On 31 March 2025, the government introduced into Parliament a reform package making major changes to

New Zealand’s financial services landscape. Included in the reform package is the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Amendment Bill which proposes to reform the regulation of credit markets to make them fairer, more efficient and transparent.

 

The overall intent of the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) is to protect consumers when borrowing money, or buying products or services on credit. The bill proposes significant changes to the CCCFA to modernise and improve the regulation of financial services, benefitting both consumers and lenders.

 

Key proposals and Implications

The bill proposes several key changes to the CCCFA. These aim to simplify and streamline compliance obligations for consumer credit providers (ie: businesses or individuals that offer credit, such as loans or credit cards) and, in some ways, reduce the risk of CCCFA breaches. We summarise the key changes.

 

FMA oversight

One of the most significant changes proposed is the shift in regulatory responsibility. The bill proposes to transfer the responsibility of enforcing the CCCFA from the Commerce Commission (CC) to the Financial Markets Authority (FMA).

 

The shift is intended to align consumer credit regulation with broader finance markets regulation under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA). This will result in the FMA becoming the sole conduct regulator for financial markets in New Zealand. By centralising regulatory oversight, the bill aims to create a more cohesive and efficient regulatory environment.

 

FMA licensing

The bill introduces a licensing regime for lenders, whereby lenders will need to be licensed under the FMA. This will replace the current certification system, where lenders must be certified by the CC (unless they are already exempt). For those already certified under the CC, there won’t be an immediate impact as they will be deemed to be licensed under the FMCA.

 

This change ensures that only qualified and responsible lenders operate in the market. The new licensing process will involve more stringent checks and ongoing compliance requirements that are intended to improve the overall quality and reliability of lenders.

 

Consequences of disclosure breaches

Another important aspect of the bill is the proposed amendment of disclosure requirements. The revision aims to avoid disproportionate consequences from minor or technical disclosure breaches.

 

The change will limit situations where a lender’s failure to make required initial or variation disclosures results in the debtor not being liable for the costs of borrowing. This change aims to balance the need for transparency with the practicalities of compliance, ensuring that consumers are adequately informed without imposing disproportionate burdens on lenders.

 

Other changes

The bill also includes some other changes for lenders that are intended to simplify and streamline the regulation of financial services. The key benefits include:

  • Revoking the due diligence duty for directors and senior managers
  • Repealing the annual reporting requirements, reducing ongoing compliance costs for lenders (ie: not required to prepare annual reports)
  • Wider exemptions for loans to borrowers who are trustees (previously this exemption only applied to family trusts, but the bill extends this to any category of trust), and
  • Lenders no longer being required to provide continuing disclosure if the borrower’s unpaid balance is available on the lender’s website, offering a more flexible approach to meeting disclosure requirements.

 

Next steps

It will be crucial for businesses to either engage, or keep up to date, with the consultation process for the reform package and to proactively adapt to the proposed changes.

 

Given the FMA’s additional role, lenders should evaluate their compliance practices to meet regulatory expectations under the licensing regime, and familiarise themselves with the additional obligations for licenced entities under the FMCA.

 

Being proactive and understanding how these changes will impact your business, especially lenders unfamiliar with FMCA licensing, will help ensure a smoother transition and improved compliance

once the changes are fully implemented.

 

Although the government has not indicated when this legislation will pass, it is expected before the end of the year. If you need assistance preparing your business for these proposed changes, please contact us. We are here to help.

DISCLAIMER: All the information published in Property Speaking is true and accurate to the best of the authors’ knowledge. It should not be a substitute for legal advice. No liability is assumed by the authors or publisher for losses suffered by any person or organisation relying directly or indirectly on this newsletter. Views expressed are those of individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Edmonds Judd. Articles appearing in Property Speaking may be reproduced with prior approval from the editor and credit given to the source.
Copyright, NZ LAW Limited, 2022.     Editor: Adrienne Olsen.       E-mail: [email protected].       Ph: 029 286 3650