Property & Conveyancing

Property briefs

Proposed reform to the Overseas Investment Act – the ability for overseas buyers to purchase or build property in New Zealand

The government recently announced a reform to the Overseas Investment Act 2005 that would allow overseas residents with a New Zealand investor residence visa to buy or build a property to the value of $5 million-plus. Applicants must satisfy the national interest test and pass the risk assessment required by the proposed legislation. After passing its first reading in June, the reform bill is currently before the select committee to receive submissions.

Currently, overseas residents and investors are largely restricted from purchasing or building property in New Zealand.

 

Granny flat legislation just passed

The Building and Construction (Small Stand-alone Dwellings) Amendment Bill was passed into law on 23 October 2025. This law change will allow small stand-alone dwellings or ‘granny flats’ of up to 70m2 to be built without a council building consent provided that certain conditions are met. These changes will roll out in the first quarter of 2026 (1 January to 31 March).

The conditions are:

  • The building must be of a simple design and comply with the Building Code
  • The work must be undertaken or supervised by a licensed building professional, and
  • The local council must be notified before the build begins and at its completion.

It will be interesting to see how this law change plays out and whether any issues arise in the future. There are also penalties for those who do not satisfy the above conditions required by the legislation.

Please do not hesitate to talk with us for advice if you are interested in building a granny flat and you want to ensure you are complying with the new requirements.

 

No further restrictions on sunset clauses in sale and purchase agreements

In our last edition (Winter 2025), we discussed the Property Law (Sunset Clauses) Amendment Bill which was introduced into Parliament in April 2025. The bill was aimed at restricting sellers developing vacant plots of land from using ‘sunset clauses’ to cancel sale and purchase agreements and to add an extra layer of protection for buyers.

To recap, a ‘sunset clause’ is a provision in an agreement enabling the seller or buyer to cancel the agreement if the development is not completed by the specified or intended date. The bill was debated at its first reading in Parliament before being voted down by a majority of 68 to 54.

The majority argued that the passage of the bill would ultimately deter developers from entering into these sale and purchase agreements, and therefore reduce the availability of off-the-plan housing when there is already a shortage of housing in New Zealand.

It was also pointed out that there are already some existing protections afforded to buyers in legislation, specifically in section 225(2b) of the Resource Management Act 1991. This clause enables buyers to give notice to the seller to cancel an agreement if, two years after the granting of a resource consent or one year after the date of the agreement, the seller has not made reasonable progress in obtaining or depositing a survey plan.

 

Changes to the assessment of earthquake-prone buildings

The government recently announced its intention to introduce the Building (Earthquake-prone Building System Reform) Amendment Bill into Parliament soon. The proposed reform focuses on increasing the threshold and implementing strict criteria that must be met to condemn a building as earthquake-prone and uninhabitable.

The proposed new regime will only capture buildings that pose a genuine risk to human life in medium to high-risk zones. Consequently, the government believes that around 55% of earthquake-prone buildings (about 2,900 buildings) will be removed from the system.

We look forward to reading the draft bill once it is introduced into Parliament; it has implications for many building owners.

 

DISCLAIMER: All the information published in Property Speaking is true and accurate to the best of the authors’ knowledge. It should not be a substitute for legal advice. No liability is assumed by the authors or publisher for losses suffered by any person or organisation relying directly or indirectly on this newsletter. Views expressed are those of individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Edmonds Judd. Articles appearing in Property Speaking may be reproduced with prior approval from the editor and credit given to the source.
Copyright, NZ LAW Limited, 2022.     Editor: Adrienne Olsen.       E-mail: [email protected]       Ph: 029 286 3650


Can you rely on them?

The general rule of thumb when you buy a property is that the more information you can find out about the property, the better. Sometimes, the information you are interested in will be offered by the seller or their real estate agent. Can you rely as much on information obtained from these parties as you could using a third party? And how does the information provided by the seller or their agent affect your rights under the contract for sale and purchase?

 

Real estate agent disclosures

Disclosures brought to your attention by real estate agents are usually presented in a form of acknowledgement that you may be asked to sign as part of submitting an offer to buy a property. These include defects that the seller is aware of and that they have a legal obligation to tell you about.

It is important to check carefully whether any defects in respect of a property you are buying are disclosed to you before you make your offer; known defects could limit your right to claim compensation or cancel the agreement.

You should be mindful of any disclosures that are made to you and where you think further investigation is required. You should investigate the full extent of that defect or how a defect could affect your ownership or your ability to complete the agreement. Make sure you get advice on including terms and conditions specific to those defects.

A common example of a pre-contract disclosure might be of a conservatory built without the relevant consents or permits. Important things to consider are whether you can get insurance that your lender is satisfied with considering what is now a known defect. The way clauses are drafted is important to reserve your right to cancel the agreement if the defect impacts on your ability to get insurance or bank lending.

 

When your buyer informs you of defects

If you are selling a property, and your buyer cancels due to defects that they have discovered due to their own due diligence investigation and disclose these to you, you have an obligation to all subsequent prospective buyers to disclose that defect. You should consider the risk of this carefully in deciding whether to obtain a copy of the building report from your buyer if they cancel.

If the defects are minor, it may be useful to get these fixed; this is likely to assist you with any subsequent attempts to sell your property.

 

Other disclosures

Other disclosures from an agent can include advising that they are related to the seller or making you aware of some other connection (a work or business connection or interest) that they may have.

 

Vendor-supplied reports

Sometimes, to assist in the sale of their property, the seller will already have specialist reports and make these available to prospective purchasers to expedite the due diligence process.

In some cases, these may be reports that they have obtained from a prior purchaser who cancelled the agreement. You should check the date on any reports that are provided as sellers who have been marketing their properties for extended periods may be providing outdated data. Small or minor defects picked up six months ago may have worsened since the report was prepared.

You should also check the disclaimers in the reports as any reliance on the report or the right to go back to the relevant inspector is reserved for the people who commission the report. Where this is the case, you will not have any contractual right of compensation against an inspector who overlooked something that would have meant you may not have bought the property or that you incurred significant costs to fix.

If it’s important that you rely on a report, you should obtain your own report or ask that the inspector re-addresses the report to you; there may be a fee for this.

When you are looking to buy a property, satisfying yourself in all aspects of your due diligence is crucial to ensure you don’t wind up with a lemon.

To best use and account for information that you obtain before you make an offer, talk with us about ways you can incorporate these into the agreement for sale and purchase. This will help protect your interests and guard against any unknown surprises that might be lurking beneath the surface.

 

DISCLAIMER: All the information published in Property Speaking is true and accurate to the best of the authors’ knowledge. It should not be a substitute for legal advice. No liability is assumed by the authors or publisher for losses suffered by any person or organisation relying directly or indirectly on this newsletter. Views expressed are those of individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Edmonds Judd. Articles appearing in Property Speaking may be reproduced with prior approval from the editor and credit given to the source.
Copyright, NZ LAW Limited, 2022.     Editor: Adrienne Olsen.       E-mail: [email protected]  Ph: 029 286 3650