EnduringPowerOfAttorney

Waipa is becoming one of New Zealand’s most attractive retirement destinations, with new retirement villages reflecting a growing community preparing for the next chapter of life.

For Steve, this became personal when his grandmother started talking about leaving the family home she had lived in for over 40 years. It wasn’t just a house to her — it was where she raised her children, hosted countless Sunday dinners, and built a lifetime of memories. The idea of moving brought both practical questions and a deep sense of emotion for the whole family.

Steve noticed that while his grandmother was ready for a simpler lifestyle, she was unsure about what came next — whether to downsize, consider a retirement village, and whether her legal affairs were still in order.

Together, they discovered her Will hadn’t been reviewed in many years and no longer reflected changes in her family or her current wishes. It was a gentle reminder of how easily these documents can become out of date over time. They also spoke about Enduring Powers of Attorney, ensuring the right people could step in if needed, and the importance of carefully understanding retirement village agreements before making any decisions.

Taking the time to get everything in order gave Steve’s grandmother real peace of mind. It also reassured Steve and the rest of the family that her wishes were clear and would be respected.

With the right planning and legal guidance from the team at Edmonds Judd, what initially felt overwhelming became a clear, supported transition — allowing Steve’s grandmother to focus on enjoying her next chapter with confidence, comfort, and security.

 

Rachael Beattie


Enduring Power of Attorney

Is the attorney carrying out their role correctly?

If your family member is losing capacity and has an Enduring Power of Attorney (EPA) in place, you will be reassured that their attorney is working in your loved one’s best interests. Very occasionally, however, this isn’t the case. In this article, we look at how an EPA works and what can be done if you believe the attorney is not doing their job properly.

 

Enduring power of attorney

An EPA is a legal document that allows someone else to step into another’s shoes and make decisions on their behalf if they lose the capacity to make important decisions for themselves. An attorney is usually a close relative or trusted friend of the person losing capacity (the donor).

There are two types of EPA: for personal care and welfare, and for property.

An EPA for personal care and welfare allows the attorney to make decisions on behalf of the donor about things such as medical treatment and living situations – including residential care.

An EPA for property allows the attorney to make decisions about a person’s assets and allows them to directly access bank accounts, selling property, making payments on the donor’s behalf and so on.

EPAs can be a very effective way of ensuring that decisions can be made in a timely and cost-effective way for the benefit of the donor. An EPA also allows the donor to decide, in advance of losing capacity, who they want making decisions on their behalf should the need arise. But, as an EPA provides the attorney with significant powers, an EPA can be misused or abused.

 

Getting information

If you are suspicious that the attorney is not working in the donor’s best interests, you should gather information about what the attorney is actually doing.

Ask them for a broad overview of the steps that they are taking on behalf of the donor and discuss with them any concerns that you might have.

When the donor made the EPA, one of the questions they will have been asked is whether they wanted their attorney to consult with other family members before making decisions, or whether they wanted their attorney to provide information to other family members.

If you have not seen the EPA document, you can ask if either of those provisions were included. If the donor made it a requirement that the attorney either consults with you or provides information to you, then that will give you enhanced powers to obtain important information.

If the donor did not include a requirement that the attorney consult with you or provide you with information, you can still ask for an overview; many attorneys will be happy to provide that.

But if you are not receiving information and you have ongoing concerns – what can you do?

 

Could the attorney transfer assets to themselves?

As an attorney has the ability to access the donor’s assets, sometimes issues can arise where the attorney will act for their own benefit, and not the benefit of the donor. They may transfer money to themselves, withdraw and fail to account for cash, or make personal use of the donor’s property, for example living in their property without paying rent or making use of their car.

If you are concerned that this is happening to your family member, you can apply to the Family Court under the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 to have the court review particular transactions or decisions made by the attorney. It is also possible to apply to the Family Court to have the attorney removed and replaced if they are acting outside of the powers given to them by the donor.

The court process is not straightforward, but it can provide effective remedies to protect the donor and their assets from abuse.

 

Assets taken by the attorney after donor dies?

It is not uncommon for an attorney’s actions to come to light only after the death of the donor, usually when there is significantly less in the donor’s estate than was expected.

The Family Court can review an attorney’s decisions either before or after the donor’s death. It is not necessarily too late to recover assets that the attorney has transferred to themselves without authority.

 

Conclusion

There are steps that concerned family members can take if they are suspicious about the actions of a donor’s attorney. These include obtaining information, recovering misappropriated assets and having the attorney removed if needed.

If you are unsure of the status of your family member’s affairs, don’t hesitate to contact us – we are here to help.

DISCLAIMER: All the information published in Trust eSpeaking is true and accurate to the best of the authors’ knowledge. It should not be a substitute for legal advice. No liability is assumed by the authors or publisher for losses suffered by any person or organisation relying directly or indirectly on this newsletter. Views expressed are those of individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Edmonds Judd. Articles appearing in Trust Speaking may be reproduced with prior approval from the editor and credit given to the source.
Copyright, NZ LAW Limited, 2025.     Editor: Adrienne Olsen.       E-mail: [email protected]      M: 029 286 3650


A few years into Steve’s retirement, things started to change.

 

Steve was not quite himself anymore. He became forgetful, sometimes confused, and would occasionally lose track of where he was or what he had planned for the day. At first his children, Luke and Sally thought it might just be part of getting older. But over time, it became clear that it was something more serious. Steve was beginning to lose mental capacity.

 

It was a difficult time. Watching the strong and capable father they had always relied on start to struggle was heartbreaking. But one thing made a huge difference. Steve had prepared for this.

 

Years earlier, with the help of Edmonds Judd, Steve had put in place Enduring Powers of Attorney. He had taken the time to meet with a lawyer, talk through his options, and sign the documents while he was still well and able to make decisions for himself. He had appointed both types of attorney. One for property, which would allow his children to manage his finances and property. And one for personal care and welfare, where he had named Sally as his first attorney to make decisions about his health and daily care.

 

When Steve’s condition worsened, Luke and Sally were able to step in without any delays or uncertainty. Luke handled the financial side, making sure bills were paid and everything stayed in order. Sally worked closely with Steve’s doctor and made the final call on his treatment when he was no longer able to do so himself.

 

There was no need to go through the courts. There were no arguments about what should happen or who should decide. Steve had made his choices clear, and they could simply carry them out.

Because of the advice and support he received from Edmonds Judd, Steve’s family had the tools they needed to care for him with clarity and compassion. His wishes were protected, and his children could focus on what mattered most.

 

It was not just legal paperwork. It was peace of mind. And it made all the difference when Steve and his family needed it most.

Georgia Willard