Startups

Caution for investors, startup advisers and board observers

Startup companies often rely on advisers, investors and board observers to help guide their new businesses. This is a good thing, but it carries hidden risk.

If you are in one of these roles, in some circumstances, you can be treated as a director, even if you never formally agreed to the appointment. If this happens, it can expose you to personal liability.

 

Directors vs advisers: What’s the difference?

Directors are responsible for the overall governance and strategic direction of the business.

Directorship also comes with legal compliance under the Companies Act 1993. There are significant consequences for directors if things go wrong.

On the other hand, advisers and board observers typically provide strategic, non-binding guidance for the directors to take into consideration when making decisions.

In theory, this is a clear distinction. The line, however, can become blurred. What matters is what you do in practice, rather than your title.

 

How do people become accidental directors?

This is common in startups, where governance structures are still evolving and roles are often informal. Having said that, this is still a real risk for any company. Courts tend to focus on how you are fulfilling your role as an adviser or observer in practice. Warning signs include:

  • The board of directors regularly following your instructions or directions
  • Being involved in decision-making on the same level as directors, and/or
  • Exercising authority normally reserved for directors.

If these patterns develop, you may be seen as a deemed director.

 

Personal liability

Directors’ duties are personal. If a company gets into financial trouble, the directors are exposed to personal liability, and in some instances may be required to personally contribute to company debts. This risk doesn’t just apply to those formally appointed. If you are treated as a director in substance, you may carry this risk without even realising you’ve taken it on.

 

A risk area

Board observers and startup advisers are particularly exposed because their role sits very close to the line. For example, an observer may:

  • Attend meetings and receive board papers
  • Provide input on strategy or decisions, and/or
  • Represent investor interests.

 

That’s fine, but the risk increases where:

  • You participate in decision-making on significant matters
  • The board tends to follow your recommendations
  • Your role is not clearly recorded as ‘observer only,’ and/or
  • You (or your investor) have significant control or approval rights.

Over time, what starts as ‘advice’ can start to look like decision-making.

 

This is one of those areas where things can drift without anyone noticing. Everyone is acting in good faith, wanting the business to succeed, but the legal position gradually shifts. If you are involved in a startup as an adviser, investor or observer, it’s worth asking yourself:

  • Am I just advising, or am I influencing decisions?
  • Does the board treat my input as optional or as direction?
  • Is my role clearly documented and understood?

Small changes in how you operate can make a big difference.

 

Be careful

Being an adviser or board observer is often valuable and rewarding, and is of great benefit to startups. However, there are real risks with these roles that are not always obvious. If your involvement crosses the line into decision-making or control, the law may consider you as a director, exposing you to all the responsibility and possible personal liability that comes with that title.

It pays to be clear about your role from the outset and to keep checking that your involvement hasn’t crept further than intended. If you’re not sure where that line sits in your situation, it’s a good time to get legal advice to help avoid unintended consequences.

 

DISCLAIMER: All the information published in Fineprint is true and accurate to the best of the authors’ knowledge. It should not be a substitute for legal advice. No liability is assumed by the authors or publisher for losses suffered by any person or organisation relying directly or indirectly on this newsletter. Views expressed are those of individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Edmonds Judd. Articles appearing in Fineprint may be reproduced with prior approval from the editor and credit given to the source.
Copyright, NZ LAW Limited, 2026.     Editor: Adrienne Olsen.       E-mail: [email protected]     Ph: 029 286 3650 


Budget 2025

‘Fiscally conservative’?

On 22 May, the Minister of Finance, the Hon Nicola Willis, presented what she had termed a ‘No BS Budget.’ It is officially entitled ‘The Growth Budget.’

 

Described by the minister as being ‘fiscally conservative,’ public expectations were not high for a lolly scramble of funding for new initiatives.

 

In the weeks leading up to the Budget, the minister drip-fed announcements of about $1.9 billion of new spending and, amongst others, a significant ‘restructure’ to the pay equity regime. As a result,

it was anticipated that on Budget Day, there would be what the minister has called ‘reprioritising of spending.’

 

Over the past few years, New Zealand has experienced an extended period of high inflation, high interest rates and low growth. With this 2025 Budget and despite worldwide geopolitical and geoeconomic tensions, the minister has indicated New Zealand’s fiscal outlook will gradually recover, despite an initial period of retraction. The government now expects what the minister has called ‘a modest surplus’ by 2028–29.

 

Good news for business

Called Investment Boost, businesses can now write off 20% of the value of productive new assets such as machinery, tools and equipment from that year’s taxable income – in addition to regular depreciation rates. By encouraging investment, the government expects a 1% increase in GDP and wages by 1.5% over the next 20 years, with half of these gains being in the next five years.

 

Greeted positively by the business sector, these new rules came into force on 22 May, passed under urgency after the Budget was presented.

 

Intended to attract foreign investment to this country, the government has created a new agency, Invest New Zealand. The agency’s objective is to create a vibrant investment market in this country. Initially collaborating with New Zealand Trade and Enterprise, Invest New Zealand has a clear direction to attract international capital, ideas and expertise in order to lift wages and grow the country’s economy.

 

Additionally, the government says it will be easier for startups to compete for talent by changing how employee share schemes are taxed.

 

Supporting New Zealand’s strong position in the film industry, screen production rebates will be renewed.

 

Government cuts contributions to KiwiSaver

The government’s contribution to KiwiSaver accounts is to be halved. Until now, KiwiSaver account holders have received $521 a year from the government; this is to be cut to $260.72.

 

In addition, the threshold for the minimum ‘default’ rate of employee and matching employer KiwiSaver contributions is to be increased from 3% to 4%; this is to be a two-step process over the next three years. This will be optional; KiwiSaver account holders may opt to stay at 3%. With many KiwiSaver balances ‘modest,’ the minister says this change should encourage New Zealanders to save more for their retirement.

 

More positive news for New Zealand’s younger taxpayers is that 16 and 17-year-olds will start to receive government contributions to their KiwiSaver from July (currently there is no contribution). Requirements for employers to match these deposits will start in 2026.

 

Benefits

Jobseeker and emergency benefits to be means tested: Not anticipated by pundits, 18 and 19-year-olds will have their Jobseeker and emergency benefits tested against their parents’ incomes, although there are some exemptions. The threshold against which these benefits will be measured is yet to be decided.

 

Medicine prescriptions: The length of a prescription is to be extended from three months to 12 months.

 

Working for Families: Targeted at low to middle-income families with children, the family income threshold and abatement rate will increase by an average of $14/fortnight. The additional cost for this will be funded by extending the income testing for the Best Start tax credit to include the first year after having a child, as well as the current situation of means testing for the second and third years. Payments will cease when a family’s income reaches $97,000 a year.

 

SuperGold card: A rise in the income threshold will allow a rates rebate for 66,000 additional lower income households with a SuperGold cardholder.

 

Disability Support Allowance: $760 million has been allocated to support the disability sector. The government has called this a ‘seismic shift’ in funding.

 

More . . .

Already announced and included in Thursday’s Budget is more funding for health, education, law and order, and other frontline public services. This includes:

  • Significant additional funding for the education sector for children with additional learning needs, schools/early childhood education and tertiary operational grants; additional help with maths skills; and lifting school attendance,
  • Nelson Hospital is to undergo a much-publicised need for redevelopment, together with Wellington’s emergency department. Auckland hospitals are to be upgraded,
  • After decades of underinvestment, the country’s rail will receive a $460 million upgrade to the metro and regional rail networks, and
  • The Defence Force will receive significantly more investment to boost New Zealand’s capabilities for the army, navy and air force, and in cyberspace.

 

To read the Budget in more detail, click here for the minister’s Budget speech.

 

If you would like to discuss the implications of the government’s business incentives, please don’t hesitate to contact us.

 

Major changes ahead for New Zealand’s financial landscape.